Silane Coupling Agents (siblings)
KH-550 vs KH-792
KH-550 (monoamine, ethoxy) and KH-792 (diamine, methoxy) are the two primary amino silane coupling agents. This comparison covers functional group differences, resin compatibility, processing implications, and selection criteria for each.
Specifications
| Functional Group | KH-550: primary amine / KH-792: primary + secondary amine |
| Hydrolysis Groups | KH-550: ethoxy / KH-792: methoxy |
| Hydrolysis Rate | KH-550: moderate / KH-792: faster |
| Epoxy Reactivity | KH-550: moderate / KH-792: high |
| Byproduct | KH-550: ethanol / KH-792: methanol |
| Cost | KH-550: lower / KH-792: ~20–30% higher |
Applications
- KH-550 recommended: general epoxy composite sizing, polyurethane adhesive primer, anti-corrosion coatings
- KH-792 recommended: structural epoxy adhesives, high-crosslink aerospace composites, nylon bonding systems
Key Features
- Both are aminosilane coupling agents with CAS numbers 919-30-2 (KH-550) and 1760-24-3 (KH-792)
- KH-792 diamine structure provides higher amine equivalent weight and crosslink density
- KH-550 is preferred where methanol emissions are a regulatory concern
Send Inquiry
Technical Details
Overview
KH-550 and KH-792 are the two most important amino silane coupling agents used globally. Both belong to the aminopropylsilane family and perform the same fundamental role: bonding epoxy, polyurethane, and other electrophilic polymer systems to glass, silica, and metal oxide substrates. Their CAS numbers are 919-30-2 (KH-550) and 1760-24-3 (KH-792), and their chemistry differs in one critical way: KH-550 carries a single primary amine, while KH-792 carries both a primary amine at the end of the chain and a secondary amine in the middle.
This amine architecture difference has cascading effects on reactivity, crosslink density, byproduct profile, cost, and appropriate application range. Understanding these differences allows formulators and procurement buyers to make an informed choice between the two grades rather than defaulting to the more expensive KH-792 for all applications or economizing with KH-550 where KH-792's higher performance is genuinely needed.
Key Differences
The primary differences between KH-550 and KH-792 that affect selection:
Amine functionality: KH-550 has one primary amine (–NH₂), giving one reactive amine site per molecule. KH-792 has one primary amine and one secondary amine (–NH–) in the alkyl chain, giving two reactive sites per molecule. Secondary amines are more reactive toward epoxy groups than primary amines at typical ambient and moderate cure temperatures.
Hydrolysis groups: KH-550 uses ethoxy groups (–OC₂H₅); KH-792 uses methoxy groups (–OCH₃). Methoxy groups hydrolyze faster in aqueous systems and in the presence of filler surface moisture. This gives KH-792 faster substrate bonding kinetics but also shorter pot life in prepared aqueous solutions.
Byproduct of hydrolysis: KH-550 releases ethanol (OEL: 1000 ppm, low regulatory concern). KH-792 releases methanol (OEL: 200–400 ppm, higher regulatory concern in enclosed facilities). In well-ventilated industrial settings this distinction rarely matters; in enclosed mixing operations with limited air exchange, it becomes relevant to industrial hygiene monitoring.
Reactivity with epoxy: At equivalent cure temperature and loading, KH-792 achieves higher crosslink density in epoxy systems due to the diamine structure. The secondary amine's higher intrinsic reactivity toward epoxy also means faster gel time contribution in sensitive formulations.
Cost: KH-550 is consistently 20–35% less expensive than KH-792 from Chinese suppliers, reflecting the more complex synthesis required for the diamine structure. For high-volume applications, this cost difference is commercially significant.
Molecular weight and amine equivalent weight: KH-550 has MW 221.37 g/mol and amine equivalent weight approximately 73 g/eq (for the primary amine only). KH-792 has MW 222.36 g/mol (almost identical) but amine equivalent weight approximately 54 g/eq (for both amines combined). Lower equivalent weight means KH-792 contributes more amine functionality per gram in stoichiometric calculations for epoxy-amine adhesives.
When to Choose KH-550
KH-550 is the correct choice in the majority of industrial amino silane applications:
Glass fiber composite sizing — for standard industrial epoxy composites (wind turbine blades, GRP pipe, automotive structural parts). KH-550 provides adequate wet strength retention at lower cost. The performance difference between KH-550 and KH-792 sizing is measurable in laboratory tests but often below the precision of production-scale property variability.
Epoxy anticorrosion coatings and primers on steel — at 0.2–0.5 wt% in the resin component, KH-550 provides excellent adhesion improvement to steel and galvanized surfaces in marine and industrial maintenance coatings. The higher performance of KH-792 is not justified in most coating applications at these loadings.
Polyurethane sealants — KH-550 is the standard adhesion promoter in 1K and 2K PU sealants for construction and automotive glazing. The ethanol byproduct and lower reactivity toward isocyanate groups versus methanol-releasing KH-792 may be preferred in sealed-space production.
ATH and MDH flame-retardant cable compounds — KH-550 at 1.0–2.0 wt% on filler weight is the standard treatment for hydroxide fillers in LSZH cable compounds. KH-792 offers no meaningful performance advantage in this application.
Mineral filler surface treatment — For kaolin, talc, and silica in general thermoplastic compounds, KH-550 provides adequate performance at lower cost.
When to Choose KH-792
KH-792 is justified when the additional cost is offset by performance requirements that KH-550 cannot meet:
Aerospace structural adhesives — In bonded metal joints for aircraft structures (Al-Al, CFRP-metal), the wet adhesion retention specification (typically 80–90% of dry after 500 hours in warm humidity) requires the higher crosslink density that KH-792's diamine structure provides. Many aerospace adhesive specifications (Airbus AIMS, Boeing BMS) explicitly call out the Z-6020/A-1120 (KH-792 equivalent) grade for this reason.
High-performance wind turbine blade spar cap bonding — Adhesive bond lines in glass/carbon fiber hybrid spar caps experience cyclic loading in a temperature-variable, humidity-variable environment. The fatigue-life improvement from KH-792 versus KH-550 at these bond lines over a 25-year turbine life is significant enough to justify the premium.
Nylon and polyamide bonding — KH-792's secondary amine undergoes transamidation reactions with nylon surface amide bonds, creating covalent surface attachment that KH-550 cannot achieve. For bonding nylon 6 or nylon 66 substrates with epoxy adhesives, KH-792 is the correct choice.
Automotive crash structure adhesives — In energy-absorbing structural adhesive joints in modern vehicle body structures (A-pillar, B-pillar, floor sill), the adhesive must maintain bond integrity through 15 years of climate cycling. Some premium automotive adhesive specifications require KH-792 equivalent chemistry.
Sourcing and Pricing Notes
Both KH-550 and KH-792 are available from multiple Chinese manufacturers with equivalent purity to Western brands (Dow Z-6011/Z-6020, Momentive A-1100/A-1120) but at 20–40% lower cost. The CAS number is the definitive specification for procurement: CAS 919-30-2 for KH-550, CAS 1760-24-3 for KH-792.
Request a Certificate of Analysis confirming GC purity (≥98% for KH-550, ≥97% for KH-792), water content (≤0.1 wt%), and color (APHA ≤100). For critical structural bonding applications, consider requesting Intertek or SGS third-party verification on the first order from a new supplier.
Minimum order quantity is typically 25 kg (one drum) for both grades. Bulk pricing is available at 200 kg (drum) and 1000 kg (IBC) levels.
Grades Compared
KH-550 vs KH-792
Availability
Both In Stock
Sample
Within 5 business days
Availability
In Stock